‘U turn or You’ll lose’ – warning to PM from Tory rebels about school funding formula

Janet Downs's picture

‘U turn or You’ll lose’ – that was the message to Prime Minister Theresa May from Tory MP Geoffrey Clifton-Brown on Radio 4’s Today this morning*.

Clifton-Brown agreed with the interviewer’s blunt summary of his strong feelings against the proposed funding formula for schools in England.  ‘Exactly!’ he said.

He’s never rebelled in 25 years but the proposals now being consulted upon made him angry.  The proposed formula, supposedly designed to eradicate funding inconsistencies, was enshrining current unfairness, he said.  He described how every primary and secondary school in Gloucestershire, already underfunded, would lose under the new plan. 

Clifton-Brown wasn’t alone.  Nine MPs had joined him at a meeting with Theresa May making her aware of their anger.  And they were just the ‘tip if the iceberg’, he said.  A large number of Tory MPs were furious about how the plans would cause schools in their constituencies to lose out.

If the funding proposals were presented to Parliament in their present form, Clifton-Brown said, the Government would be defeated.

School funding isn’t the only issue that causes ructions among Tory MPs.   Proposals to build new grammars and increase selection are opposed by many back bench Tories including former education secretary Nicky Morgan.  The Bright Blue think tank, which describes itself as a ‘pressure group for liberal conservatism’ has said ‘The Government is wasting precious political capital on re-introducing grammar schools.’  And the cross-party Education Select Committee, chaired by Tory Neil Carmichael, has described the proposals as an unnecessary distraction’.

Building new grammar schools is currently illegal.  The Government would have to ask Parliament’s permission to overturn the ban.  It appears May hopes to forestall a Tory rebellion on this issue by delaying a vote until after the 2020 election, Schools Week reports.  The plans could be incorporated in the Tory Manifesto and, if the Conservatives won the election with a pro-grammar clause in place, rebellious Tory MPs could be ‘pressured into line’.

Conservative MPs who oppose selection would then have to make a choice: vote for the Government and be a hypocrite or behave honourably according to their conscience and vote against.  Tory candidates at the next election may find themselves squirming if asked whether they support a Manifesto pledge to reintroduce selection and, if not, how would they vote.  May would be well-advised to drop plans to set up new grammar schools.

 UPDATE  Future voters from Yerbury School sing 'Schools Just Wanna Have Funds'.  Watch here.

*available here for 29 days at 1.17 into the programme






Share on Twitter Share on Facebook

Be notified by email of each new post.


Brian R Wilson's picture
Sat, 18/03/2017 - 09:26

Schools are not getting enough money. And the money available is still not being fairly dished out. But also schools are having to spend increasing amounts on things that have little to do with teaching and learning. A lot of the administration that used to be done by Local Authorities is now heaped on schools. Business stuff, which basically means touting for custom, also soaks up cash. Local Management and Open Enrollment, the twin mantras of the 1990s, are chickens coming home to roost.

Janet Downs's picture
Sat, 18/03/2017 - 09:33

Yes - schools which converted to academy status believing they would receive extra cash realised, belatedly, that the extra cash would have to be spent on administration and adhering to Company and Charities law.  And, as you say, when competition between schools is encouraged, more money needs to be spent on marketing - glossy websites, inspirational videos etc.

Add new comment

Already a member? Click here to log in before you comment. Or register with us.