The news today that assaults on teachers have risen to a five-year-high
and that nearly 1,000 children are excluded from school every day got me thinking about behaviour in our schools.
I find headlines like this depressing because they actually tell us very little about what is really going on in schools. I suspect, though I certainly can't prove, that government cut-backs have probably had an effect on children's behaviour because valuable support such as having pastoral staff being paid to do things like make home-school contact and support teachers have been drastically cut recently
Having engaged in various media debates about behaviour over the years, I've increasingly come to the conclusion that it's impossible to generalise about behaviour in schools. My novel, that I've just published, The Last Day Of Term
, details a fictional inner-city school which contains some very bad behaviour -- there's a major riot which leads to the death of a teacher -- and yet, I think I make it clear that some teachers conduct very orderly lessons even within this context. The fact is that children who may be very poorly behaved with one teacher or in a particular context, actually behave well in others.
I've seen children rioting in some of the top schools in the country, not because the school was inherently poor but because the teacher just couldn't keep control. Usually, the worst teachers are the ones that blame everyone -- the system, the senior management, the curriculum etc -- except themselves for the poor behaviour in their classrooms. Katherine Birbalsingh
, the ex-deputy head, who is currently making a living out of saying all of our schools are riven with poor behaviour, seems just such a (ex) teacher.
But it gets more complicated than that. Even in lessons where some children may be running amok, other children may well be learning a lot. I've taken lessons like this myself; basically, I've realised that it's useless trying to admonish certain pupils constantly, and far better to concentrate upon pupils who are willing to learn. This has worked better than trying to be "strict" and running detention after detention for pupils. So I've got the good pupils working in groups and given the more difficult ones exercises which they can cope with, learn from in a meaningful fashion and work on autonomously. The atmosphere hasn't been very strict but it's worked in the long run because there's more of a positive vibe. One positive effect of a classroom where things are a bit "riotous" is that pupils know they have to do the work for themselves, that they have to work independently, that the teacher isn't going to spoon-feed them. What educationalists call "deep learning
" can really occur in them because the pupil and teacher have to encourage autonomy and intrinsic motivation. Teachers who are very strict can create the "surface" appearance of genuine learning
, but often pupils feel too frightened to ask if they don't understand and tend to imitate the teacher rather than genuinely learning about a subject themselves.