Let them eat apps

Matthew Bennett's picture
 2

The Trussell Trust is a charity which runs a network of over 400 food banks.  Earlier this month, the Trust reported that a spike in demand for its help last summer was due to ‘holiday hunger’ among children entitled to free school meals.  The all-party parliamentary group on hunger has warned that as many as three million children are at risk of going hungry during the summer holidays.

This is further evidence of the effects of eight years of austerity on children in the UK.  The TUC claims that the number of children growing up in poverty in working households will be one million higher this year than in 2010.  The Equality and Human Rights Commission says that an additional one and a half million may be pushed into poverty by 2022.  Children’s services have undergone savage cuts.  In November, a report from three children’s charities noted that council spending on early intervention services fell by 40 per cent between 2010 and 2016.  The Sutton Trust says that as many as 1000 Sure Start centres may have closed since 2009 – twice as many as had been reported by the government.

But there is some good news too.  In a recent speech to the Resolution Foundation, setting out his ‘vision for boosting social mobility’, the education secretary Damian Hinds announced that ‘the gap in early years development’ has fallen by 14 per cent since 2010.  Disadvantaged children may be hungry, but more of them are hitting more of their 17 Early Learning Goals than ever before, steadily catching up with their more privileged peers.

Regrettably, of course, we currently lack an objective measure of every four-year-old’s prospective life chances.  The new Reception year baseline assessments were scrapped in 2016, after protests from teachers, parents and unions.  But they will now be replaced, as we know, by a single, standardised and computer-based test of literacy, numeracy and behaviour at age four.  This new assessment of ‘school readiness’ will be developed by NFER, the only bidder left in the field after CEM condemned the test as ‘verging on the immoral’, and Early Excellence also refused to get involved (‘it’s absurd and ridiculous to test purely for accountability’).  Alice Bradbury, of the Institute of Education, noted that ‘you don’t need qualified teacher status to administer a computer test – a robot could deliver it’.  Yes, indeed.  A new computerised times tables test for seven-year-olds – described by the DfE as an ‘innovative use of technology in testing’ – is already being piloted.

There is no room for complacency.  Bold Beginnings, Ofsted’s report on the Reception year, notes that New Labour’s Early Learning Goals are no longer ‘aligned with the now-increased expectations of the National Curriculum’.  The high-performing schools visited by Ofsted solve this problem by using ‘content from Year 1 National Curriculum programmes of study to plan and teach in Reception’, with lots of ‘direct teaching of reading, writing and mathematics’.  According to the report, these model schools are already using standardised tests, rather than teacher observation, to assess Reception children – because observation yields ‘only shallow and unnecessary information about a child’s achievements’.  (As for learning through play – well, that was always based on much ‘too rosy and unrealistic a view of childhood’.)  If these tests can be computerised too, so much the better.  As the DfE is always reminding us, the ‘effective and evidence-based use of technology’ is the key to reducing teachers’ workload.

And Hinds used his speech to the Resolution Foundation to open a new front in the government’s war on ‘burning injustices’.  This new battlefield is the pre-school ‘home learning environment’.  How can we close the attainment gaps which are already opening, slowly but inexorably, in our children’s pre-school lives?  It’s a challenge for everyone, but especially for those of us in ‘businesses, the media, the voluntary sector, and our tech industry’.

Now, we know that all of us live in two worlds now – the real one and the virtual one. It’s easy for kids and parents to spend a lot of our time looking at the screen – whether it’s our phones, our TVs, our laptops.

And we can derive huge benefits from this.  Life is much faster, more convenient, more entertaining; but as we all know there are also downsides if we downgrade the benefits of the real world […]

But are we also missing a trick here? If our phones and apps can help us bank, shop, diet, exercise and figure out where we are.

Why not also help us with helping our children develop their communication and reading?  [sic]

The DfE will be ‘launching a competition to identify high quality apps’ which could be distributed free to ‘disadvantaged families’ – along with food parcels from the Trussell Trust, perhaps.

Shortly after talking to the Resolution Foundation, Hinds gave a speech to the World Education Forum on the need for ‘new technology to spearhead a classroom revolution’.

Melissa Benn said recently that the government was running out of ideas on education.  I think they are pursuing a very definite agenda:  privatising schools, and pushing the products of ‘our tech industry’ into the newly-privatised system.  The fact that this was never in any manifesto, and is spun to the public as some kind of crusade for social justice – a very dead horse indeed – doesn’t mean that there is no plan.

Share on Twitter

Be notified by email of each new post.





Comments

Roger Titcombe's picture
Wed, 22/08/2018 - 15:22

As ever, you are right on this issue Matthew. Of course there is a plan, and like nearly everything else bad in education in recent years it comes from the US. Do you follow the US blogger Nancy Bailey? You can find her here.

https://nancyebailey.com/

She comments regularly on these depressing developments in the US education education, which will be on their way here as quick as you can you can say, 'chlorinated chicken'.


John Mountford's picture
Thu, 23/08/2018 - 08:07

This outlines possibilities from the US for the plan Roger is referring to. Fiona is so wrong, politicians of all persuasions will never run out of plans to change things to suit their ideologies. It's just they do it every time there is a change of Sectetary of State or government and it seldom, if ever, delivers what young people and our society needs in the real world. Let's hope they do not have to eat apps, then!!

https://nancyebailey.com/2018/08/21/my-blogging-anniversary-how-has-scho...


Add new comment

Already a member? Click here to log in before you comment. Or register with us.