What happened then…?

Neil Fletcher's picture
At least three members of the House of Lords, a junior minister, Executive Chair of the Commission for Racial Equality, Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman, Head of the Home Civil Service, The Schools Adjudicator for England, Chief Financial Officer of the Australian Government Solicitor, a Vice Chancellor, Director of the Institute of Education, the first female Master of Birkbeck College, Chief Executive of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, Health, Safety & Environment Manager for the Northern Line, numerous professors, policy advisers to Prime Ministers and Ministers in the UK and all over the world. What do such people have in common? Answer? They all worked for the Inner London Education Authority in its glory and finally in its dying days. If we added in elected members, we could include the Chief Executive of the Audit Commission, the Parliamentary Director of Parliamentary Affairs for the Royal Society of Chemistry, the Executive Head of Education for the Local Government Association – and many more.

Twenty-five years ago, on 1 April 1990, what many regarded as the greatest Education Authority ever, in terms of the service it provided and the talent it employed, went out of existence. Without reciting the blow-by-blow accounts of its botched breakup, a process from which none of Thatcher, Kenneth Baker, Michael Heseltine, or Norman Tebbitt emerge with anything remotely resembling credit (and that is putting it mildly) it is interesting to measure the scale of popular support it enjoyed.

First, while elected members of ILEA, the vast majority of the 12 borough councils and the City of London who were to inherit the service and might have been expected to welcome such an inheritance, were fiercely opposing the crude populism behind the abolition, parents across the city campaigned to protect it.

A remarkable and entirely parent-led organisation set itself up, with groups of parents in every one of the 1,200 ILEA schools, who organised petitions, and eventually a London-wide ballot of parents overseen by the Election Reform Society. The ballot was held in the weeks leading up to the Commons vote in 1988. With over 70% of eligible parents voting, the majority in favour of retaining ILEA was 95%. Did a government led by a party allegedly wholly in favour of parent–power, and today behind a socially class-biased and flawed policy of Free Schools pay attention to such a massive group of parents speaking loudly with a single voice? Of course not. A tiny handful of London Tory MPs had their way and a number of them probably lost their seats a few years later partly as a result. Curiously, the Tories on the ILEA supported its continuation, but their informed and sincerely held views were also trashed by the Tory backbenchers who took their political leadership from the Sun newspaper. (Some things never change!)

Consequently, it was a mixed blessing to have been the Leader of the ILEA in its dying days and to have watched with a mixture of sadness and hope as I saw members and staff of the ILEA leave for the final time. Sadness that such a great team was being broken up on the personal whim of a blinkered Prime Minister and her close allies. Hope that the extension of that commitment and expertise into the LEAs taking over, as well as into the wider education world and beyond, would have a great impact because people had served their time with the ILEA.

So what happened to everyone? I have kept in contact with many former staff and members of ILEA but, inevitably, not with all. So I have wondered whether, as a way of marking 25 years, we might together try to assemble updates on as many people as possible so that we can assemble and share a portfolio of “what happened then….”.

I recognise that staff working on the front line in schools, colleges, polytechnics, teacher training, AEIs, youth centres, careers offices and the many other support services were the true stars of the ILEA, delivering education and associated services to the people of Inner London. But this project is also about another group of people, those who worked in County Hall, Divisional Education Offices and other administrative centres providing a policy framework, allocating resources, supporting front line staff and monitoring standards. These were the elected and added members of the Authority, officers, and inspectors, however senior or junior.

In order to draw a line in the sand of history we are going as far back as the date when the abolition of the GLC and the creation of a free-standing ILEA was passed into law in July 1985. In fact 1986 was the date at which the ILEA became that unique animal, a free standing, directly elected education authority – the first in the UK since 1904 when the London School Board was replaced by the London County Council.

If you were part of the ILEA at any time from 1985 until abolition then this message is directed at you.

So if you are interested in this and meet the criteria set out above I invite you to help in two ways:-

  1. provide me with a note, preferably not more than one side of A4, telling your post ILEA story.

  2. pass this on to anyone with whom you have remained in contact to help me spread the net as wide as possible;

Sadly a number of people who once belonged to the ILEA have died since 1990 – if you are able to send a published obituary or can offer a short note on any such person please do so too.

I want as many participants as possible and for the resulting document to be a historic record of an organisation for which we were proud to work.

All contributions should be emailed to dfin66@ymail.com.

Please tell us your story.

Neil Fletcher

Leader ILEA 1987-90

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook

Be notified by email of each new post.


Trevor Fisher's picture
Fri, 01/05/2015 - 12:06

I am not convinced that ILEA was a success. the fact that London challenge clearly WAS a success is due to the fact London was a disaster in terms of exam results, though possibly not in terms of Primary Provision, and needed urgent attention by 2002.

However it is a positive proposal to have a historical gathering of information, so this is something to be supported. I hope LSN will promote more attempts to network - allowing emails to be published is a really important step towards networking.

trevor fisher.

John Mountford's picture
Fri, 01/05/2015 - 13:28

Trevor, for my part on reading Neil's story, I picked up on the fact that, in relation to the plan to abolish the ILEA "parents across the city campaigned to protect it." only to be ignored.

The outcome of their campaign was, "A remarkable and entirely parent-led organisation set itself up, with groups of parents in every one of the 1,200 ILEA schools, who organised petitions, and eventually a London-wide ballot of parents overseen by the Election Reform Society. The ballot was held in the weeks leading up to the Commons vote in 1988. With over 70% of eligible parents voting, the majority in favour of retaining ILEA was 95%."

Just imagine a turnout of 70% of the electorate next week. Then imagine, if you can, 95% declaring their support for a single party. Can we imagine for one tiny moment that the voice of the people would not be honoured? What would such a mandate deliver? (AND if any should reply a totalitarian administration, then what is the value of the electoral process?)

I believe that Neil Fletcher's timely reminder of the insincerity, ugly self-interest and deceitfulness of the political classes, especially those occupying the top section of the greasy pole, should be a warning to those warm-hearted, generous and forgiving souls who will cast their votes next week in favour of the status quo. We need a major shake-up to politics in this country. When this present election delivers its inevitable, chaotic outcome, maybe we will acknowledge two things need to change before the next election:

First, there has to be reform of the process so that EVERY vote counts. (How is it possible for the votes of a few people in "key constituencies" to skew the outcome of the democratic will of the majority?)

Second, there has to be greater accountability in the system. (Why is there apparent immunity for politicians when they cheat, lie and generally cock-up because they have always been able to do so in the past?)

Neil, Trevor is right that the historical legacy of the ILEA , whatever your assessment of its strengths and weaknesses, needs to be collated and preserved. I wish you every success in making this happen.

Trevor Fisher's picture
Fri, 01/05/2015 - 14:47

the history of the issue needs to be better known, and the poll passed without notice in most of the media. Presumably the electoral reform society would have details.

The Westminster bubble ignores public opinion and acts on its own internal drives and dogmas. Every example of this needs to be publicized

trevor fisher.

Stephen Pickles's picture
Wed, 13/05/2015 - 13:42

the UCL Institute of Education Library has the archive of the London Parents Ballot Campaign. The Friends of the Newsam Library did hold a celebrarion event in 2010
Maybe you were there?

Add new comment

Already a member? Click here to log in before you comment. Or register with us.