Teachers at the STEM 6 Academy - an Islington “free” school for 16-18 year olds which opened in City Road last September – will be voting over the next fortnight on whether they are prepared to take strike action to persuade the Academy to recognise their trade union, the National Union of Teachers.
This action, if members vote for it, has become necessary because of the cheapskate and unacceptable contractual terms and conditions which the Academy’s management is attempting to impose on its staff who were threatened with “legal consequences” if they refused individually to agree to them shortly before the Xmas holiday and the Academy’s refusal to meet with union representatives in order to negotiate improvements which would bring them in to line with terms and conditions enjoyed by teachers in most other state-funded schools in Islington and elsewhere.
Aspects of the imposed contract - which NUT members only signed under duress - include:
· a paragraph entitled "Layoff" which states: "The school reserves the right to temporarily lay you off from work without normal contractual pay or to reduce your normal working hours and reduce your pay proportionately. The school will give you as much notice as it can reasonably give of its need to take such action" - in other words, pretty much a zero-hours contract!
· an annual entitlement of only three weeks paid sick leave.
· pay rises entirely at the discretion of management with no incremental progression
These deplorable terms and conditions not only show callous disregard for staff at STEM 6, they also demonstrate scant respect for students at the Academy - or their parents. Aren’t STEM 6 students entitled to be taught by decently-treated, properly paid teachers who feel secure and valued in their jobs? Or are they are only entitled to education on the cheap?
- · statutory minimum maternity leave provision, far inferior to the entitlement of most other Islington teachers employed by the local authority.
These are questions which STEM 6 students and parents might want to ask the Academy principal, John O’Shea and its chair of governors, Tony Sewell among whose admirers are Islington resident and local Mayor, Boris Johnson, who appointed him last year to chair his Education Enquiry in to how to improve the quality of London schools. (Presumably Mr Sewell thinks this can be done by exploiting and mistreating its teachers.)
Another question that Mr O’Shea could be asked is: how does he justify including Paragraph 11.1 in the STEM 6 contract of employment? Under the heading ‘Outside Interests’, it states:
Save with the prior written permission of the Deputy Principal, you must not during your employment be involved in any other work, occupation or activity whether paid or unpaid which in view of the School affects your ability to devote the whole of your time and attention during working hours to the School’s business or conflicts with the interests or causes damage to the goodwill of the School. … Failure to do so will be regarded as a disciplinary matter by the School and dealt with accordingly.
This is surely a case of double standards, since - as the Islington Tribune reported on 15 March last year, O’Shea was director of the existing Islington borough sixth form consortium of four Islington school sixth forms until September last year, while at the same time as he was centrally involved in setting up a free school in competition with them. Indeed, on 12 March he made a presentation about the proposed free school at a consultation meeting in Holloway Road where most of the small number present expressed strong opposition to the project. One parent governor of Highbury Grove School in Islington complained that he had only been informed about the STEM 6 free school project the night before the meeting when John O’Shea should have been running the Highbury Grove sixth form and others in the consortium.
So what is good for the STEM 6 Principal is clearly not good enough for the Academy’s staff!
Unfortunately, because – unlike Islington’s community schools – STEM 6, as a “free” school, is not accountable in any way to local people through their elected borough councillors. Run by a private “not-for-profit” company based in Wembley (the Skills Development Agency) it answerable only to its directors and ultimately to Michael Gove, the Secretary of State for Education. Maybe he has got some questions to answer too.