England scores more highly in maths than other EU countries, says new report

Janet Downs's picture
England’s achievement in international maths tests shows that English pupils score “significantly higher” than the average in EU countries which took part in the tests. So says Eurydice, the European Commission’s education research network, in its recent report.

Eurydice made several recommendations about effective teaching of maths in Europe:

1 Use achievement targets to motivate lower-performing pupils thereby increasing their scores.

2 Use a wide variety of teaching methods.

3 Give teachers support in the effective use of feedback from assessments.

4 Ensure that any revision in national curricula to focus more on pupils’ skills actually changes teaching in the classroom.

5 Ensure that government policies on maths are based on evidence.

Eurydice found that teachers of maths in England were already using many of the recommended methods outlined above. The report praised the Stem programme (science, technology, engineering and maths) for the way it involved all children and not just the gifted. Some countries, however, had tried a higher-profile approach. Poland, for example, had a campaign which included short TV interviews at peak time which asked famous people and professionals to talk about the importance of maths in their daily lives.

The Eurydice report shows that teaching of maths in England is good. The media, however, prefers to focus on the negative even when past reporting has been found to be wrong. Good news such as the Eurydice report and the top rating for English students in the 2007 Trends in Maths and Science Survey (TIMSS) is ignored in favour of negative articles about “plummeting down league tables”. Today, for example, the Mail published the results of a survey commissioned by an on-line tutoring business which claimed “a quarter of children aged 10 to 12 can’t do basic addition” while the positive praise from Eurydice is overlooked. But Eurydice doesn’t get a mention in the broadsheets either, unless coupled with Orpheus.

Perhaps the most important message for England is that government policies should be evidence-based. This is particularly significant when Ministers make high-profile comments about which teaching methods should, or should not, be employed in the classroom. Remarks by the schools minister, Nick Gibb, about the use of calculators are not upheld by evidence. Eurydice acknowledges there is debate about whether using a calculator helps or hinders mathematical achievement but it does not suggest their prohibition. Instead, it makes it clear that most studies “conclude that calculators might be useful but only for specific activities.” And Eurydice found that even in countries where calculators are widely allowed “teachers rarely reported using calculators often.”

Good news, then, on maths teaching in England, and some good advice from a European organisation about how to make it even better. But like much positive news about English education, it seems set to remain in the Underworld.

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook

Be notified by email of each new post.


Adrian Elliott's picture
Wed, 25/01/2012 - 10:09

The silence on this piece from those normally anxious to damn all aspects of state education is eloquent : as eloquent as the silence in the Daily Mail,Telegraph and no doubt the Times on the same topic.

Janet Downs's picture
Wed, 25/01/2012 - 10:34

Adrian - I couldn't check the Times because it's behind a paywall and I'm not a subscriber. The professional magazine, t'espro, inserted in TES (20 Jan 2012) carried several pages of positive comment including an editorial. Unfortunately, neither is available on TES on-line. I searched the Telegraph, Guardian and Independent for Eurydice again this morning, but no mention of the maths report. Searching for PISA in Focus also revealed no mention - although plenty of stuff about holidays in the Telegraph.

I also don't hold out much hope of Messrs Gove and Gibb congratulating the teachers of maths in England for their good work.

Add new comment

Already a member? Click here to log in before you comment. Or register with us.