It’s been a bad week for the Department for Education. First, the email saga is not going away. And now an official survey
conducted in autumn 2010 reveals that civil servants working in the DfE were already unhappy. Less than a quarter thought that recent changes in the Department were “usually for the better”, and only 41% felt that change was managed well, the TES
revealed today. In short, the confidence of DfE civil servants fell in 11 out of 13 categories in the few months since the Coalition took power.
A union spokesman, who was employed in the DfE but wished to remain anonymous, told the TES that there was a climate of fear at the DfE, and the spokesman predicted that this year’s survey being conducted now would reveal even greater dissatisfaction with the department. He said that “about 160 people have been shunted on to academies and free schools without being consulted.” And the evidence-based policy, much-touted before the election, had been abandoned: “it has been a case of ‘we are going to do this’ without there necessarily being the evidence to support it.”
A DfE spokesperson denied that policy wasn’t underpinned by evidence and cited the “extensive research from the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development)”. But OECD evidence is ignored when it doesn’t match Mr Gove’s ideology: the statement that the 2000 PISA figures can’t be used for comparison, the warning about excess emphasis on exam grades in England, the evidence that the best-performing school systems are the most equitable. Or it is cherry-picked: Mr Gove used the OECD remarks that the free schools/academies policy would increase user-choice but ignored the qualifications: that evidence about the effect of user-choice on educational outcomes was mixed, and the policy would need to be monitored to ensure it didn’t impact negatively on those who were already disadvantaged.
The survey confirms what many have been saying on this site for months: that the DfE is dysfunctional. If it were subject to Ofsted inspection it would be rated inadequate and placed in special measures. If it were a school it would be slated for the quality of its management.