Toby Young, in his Guardian
profile claims that the WLFS will have a formal partnership with the LOS and that, although his "Eton of the State School" will be offering nothing technical – no computing, no design and technology, no domestic science - should any pupils "passionately want to do a subject like DT", they can go for "a period or two" at the Oratory.
Curiously, this is contradicted in the LOS
letter to parents dated 8th March 2011 in which the Headmaster acknowledges parents' opposition to this arrangement:-
"The proposed partnership with the West London Free School has caused some concern in the
feedback from parents. The initial idea behind the partnership was to assist a school that was
starting up and which needed support. We have been advised that the partner should be an
existing school rather than a new school and accordingly, we are now looking to identify another
school with which to go into formal partnership".
So is there a partnership or not? It does not appear as if the LOS will be welcoming pupils from WLFS to study technical subjects which WLFS will be excluding from it's curriculum.
Comments
If it's a mistake, surely the school would want to put the record straight?
To expand on Allan Beavis's points: the proposed partnership between LOS and the WLFS was in the context of the Oratory's proposal to convert to Academy status. It is a stipulation that a school becoming an Academy partners a vulnerable or struggling school. Several parents were concerned that, as the WLFS does not yet exist, it is impossible to identify it as being struggling or vulnerable. The parents felt that it would be more in keeping with the spirit of the requirement, not to mention with the Christian ethos of the LOS, to partner a school with a more real need of support.
Since he clearly believes that there is a partnership and that WLFS pupils will be able to join classes at LOS, does this imply that the school has an undisclosed agreement with WLFS? Or is someone mistaken? Or telling "porkies"? I'm sure the parents of LOS would like clarification.
Add new comment