Scrapping 50% cap for faith applications in free schools could increase segregation – campaigners call for Inquiry

Janet Downs's picture

Faith free schools must reserve half of their applications for children who are not of the faith. 

That doesn’t mean half of pupils in faith free schools will be non-faith.  If a faith free school doesn’t receive enough non-faith applications to fill the 50% slot, then it can fill vacant places with faith pupils. 

But that isn’t enough for the Catholic Church.  It wants 100% of places in Catholic free schools to be filled by Catholics.  Non-Catholic children would only gain entrance if 100% of places weren’t filled by Catholic children. 

The education secretary Damian Hinds, educated at a selective Catholic school, wants to remove the 50% cap.   This follows concerns that Hinds isn’t impartial because he received funds from the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales in 2014/15.  The Church denies the donation was an attempt to buy influence. 

The Accord coalition  is urging those who think the 50% rule should be kept to contact Hinds urging him not to scrap it.   

The Independent says campaigners want a parliamentary committee to scrutinize the proposal to allow faith free schools to select all pupils on grounds of faith.  They argue this will increase social segregation. 

England is almost unique in allowing Catholic state schools to discriminate against non-Catholic children.   The Catholic International Education Office (OIEC), defines a Catholic school as:

‘a non-discriminatory school, open to all … in conclusion, the Catholic school is anything but a communitarian school. It is open to all … It must constantly promote intercultural and interreligious dialogue, if it is to continue its mission. This is in any case a motto of the OIEC, all over the world.‘

But ‘all over the world’ doesn’t seem to apply to England where Catholic schools* have admission criteria which discriminate against non-Catholic children.

If Christian schools really are Christian, then they should be expected to follow the words of Jesus Christ: 

‘Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God.’

Taxpayer-funded state schools should not be allowed to pick and choose which taxpayers’ children to educate.  This applies to selective schools as well as faith ones.  State-funded faith schools could retain their faith ethos but should not be allowed to discriminate against non-faith children.  There would be an element of self-selection, of course, but such an open door policy would be inclusive.  In an increasingly fragmented world, it’s important that state policies don’t encourage segregation and sectarianism. 

The Department for Education says it will publish the results of the Schools That Work for Everyone consultation, which asked for views about selection and faith schools, in due course.  It is already long overdue.  It should be published immediately.   


*This doesn’t just apply to Catholic schools.  Other faith schools, including Church of England academies or Voluntary Aided schools, have similar discriminatory admission criteria.

Share on Twitter


janee's picture
Thu, 22/02/2018 - 12:05

It has been a concern of mine that so many 'free' schools have been set up which have a religious base.  Surely experience should be telling us that religious divisions create problems and that we need to be working towards a more tolerant, understanding and integrated society.  Looking at Wikipedia gives the following faith based 'free' schools: 32 Christian based 'free' schools; 3 Hindu; 7 Jewish; 15 Mulim and 1 Sikh.  Are we next going to have schools defined as working class, middle class (of course, the upper class will, presumably, be privately educated)?  Divisions are expensive - that argument is for those who only see accounts!

John Bajina's picture
Thu, 22/02/2018 - 12:22

Faith Schools are profoundly dangerous to a balanced settled society. Headteachers in N Ireland have publicly and directly defining Faith Schools as a large contributory cause of previous, present and future unrest in the Province.
England is going down that same slippery slope.

Roger Titcombe's picture
Fri, 23/02/2018 - 16:57

The following is from 'Humanists UK'

Parents have an explicit right in the European Convention of Human Rights to bring up their children in the religion or belief of their choice without interference from the state. However, they do not have a right to state funding for confessional religious teaching or ‘faith’ schools that are in line with their own beliefs. We do not think that state schools should be allowed to choose pupils on the basis of religion, discriminating in access to a public service that should be open to all. We don’t think that state schools should be free to select teachers and other staff, or to select governors, according to their religion. We are concerned that the proliferation of state-funded religious schools is making for a more segregated future, particularly as religions whose believers tend to come from particular ethnic groups gain more state-funded schools. When studies show that religious selection for pupils also results, deliberately or otherwise, in socio-economic selection, we think the social case against religious schools is even stronger.

We want to see an end to the proliferation of state-funded ‘faith’ schools. We want a progressive withdrawal of their privileges and exemptions so that religious schools are eventually absorbed back into the wider schools sector, becoming inclusive schools for all the community.

See also my review of Stephen Pinker's new book here

Add new comment

Already a member? Click here to log in before you comment. Or register with us.