Stories + Views

Avatar Image

parent

Posted on

18/11/10

go to 3 comments

A national funding formula may make academy status irrelevent

Michael Gove must be getting desperate. His latest letter to chairs of governors practically begs schools, whether good, bad or indifferent, to consider academy status. Presumably this is because so few of the initial 1900 potential converts finally came good.

But why would a school pursue conversion now?  If every school is effectively going to become an academy via a national funding formula, we will all be ‘free’ of the local authority in due course.  And the huge sums of ‘extra’ money that are apparently showing up on the DFE ‘ready reckoner’ for potential converts ( which appear to contain a hefty bribe over and above the amount that would be recouped from the LA) will be toast in a year or two when everyone is pegged to a flat rate topped up by modest or variable pupil premium. Schools in some areas that benefit from the current formulae may even be worse off, whether they are academies or not.

Then there is the supposed allure of collaboration. Apparently ministers are dismayed that their invitation to high performing, socially advantaged schools to drift off into autonomy has been interpreted as a desire to re-create a two tier system, when in fact all they wanted to encourage was more collaboration.

But why do schools need to become academies to collaborate with more successful schools or partner schools in difficulties? They can do that now, in a variety of soft or hard federations, while remaining within the maintained system and without going through possible divisive battles in their governing bodies and local communities  that academy conversion may bring.

The gloss has gone off the academy proposal, there is always law of diminishing returns with these sorts of gimmicky,  high profile policy announcements. Soon the letters will be going straight into the bin, if they are not already.

Share this page:

Enter your email address to receive notifications of all new posts by email.

Join 72 other subscribers

Comments, replies and queries

  1. Alison says:

    I don’t see any advantage for any school if they are all academies – it will just be a change of name!

  2. Peter Hook says:

    Perhaps all this is simply a way of doing away with LAs and therefore Children’s services via a “backdoor approach”. Or am I just getting cynical in my old age!?

  3. Nigel Ford says:

    With the enactment of the 2010 Academies Act it looks like the recreation of the Grant Maintained schools launched in the 1990s by the Conservatives with the same financial incentives.

    Previously, the vast majority of comprehensive schools chose to remain under the auspices of the LEA so I think Fiona’s prediction that schools converting to acadamy status will be limited is likely to be spot on.

Want to follow comments on this post? Use the RSS feed or subscribe below

Reply